.338-.450BM (8.58 SOCOM) Development

Talk about the AR15 style rifles chambered in 450 Bushmaster.

Moderator: MudBug

Re: .338-.450BM (8.58 SOCOM) Development

Postby Hoot » Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:55 pm

kottke_35 wrote:Anybody seen this yet? 338 Spectre based off of the 6.8 spc and/or the 10mm magnum case. They are listing a 300 gr SMK bullet at about 1000fps out of an 18inch barrel. It's quite a bit different then the cartridge talked about in this forum but still may have it's place in some peoples hearts.

http://www.teppojutsu.com/338.htm

Information also found in ARRIFLEMAN March 2012 edition.

B.


That cartridge looks like one of those dogs that was spayed too young... :?

Hoot
In Theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In Practice, there is.
User avatar
Hoot
 
Posts: 5085
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:34 am
Location: Minnesota

Re: .338-.450BM (8.58 SOCOM) Development

Postby tridentarmory » Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:26 pm

ive built several rifles off the 450 case in various wildcats including a 33-450, a 375-450, and a 416-450, among others... though the concepts are great, the struggle remains in the difference between a rifle designed to be fired suppressed, or not. and what the caliber is designed to destroy.

With the 338, the struggle I FOUND.... not necessarily the same as others.... is that bullet length becomes a serious issue, and the loss of case capacity is irritatingly low once the shoulder is formed. We should have used a radius style shoulder on our design, and i encourage anyone getting into this wildcat to toss this idea around. it adds over 2 grains(at least would have with our design) capacity.

i think the 375, would be an honest shooter, but i havent actually shot one yet, though we have dimensions, and loaded ammo to be fire formed if i get the spare time to have a barrel reamed to be similar to what i have to work with.



many people forget about the caliber 358 when looking at some of these options... though you will not see giant ballistic coeffecient numbers with the .358 stuff, i honestly believe that the bullets made in this caliber are some of the best designed projectiles to expand gradually that ive ever seen... and not many people have ever complained about the power and accuracy of a 35 whelen.( one of my all time favorites)

We have since almost given up with the case of the 450 for wildcats, as we dont care much about supression. we like stuff that kills big animals.
tridentarmory
 
Posts: 181
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 1:09 pm

Re: .338-.450BM (8.58 SOCOM) Development

Postby tridentarmory » Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:35 pm

this is going to sound more rude that its intended.... so dont get any tail feathers ruffled...



WHAT IS THE BIG DEAL WITH GOING TO A 338? DOES THE BALLISTIC CO. REALLY MEAN THAT MUCH ONCE YOU ARE UNDER THE SOUND BARRIER....?

why not just use a 450B.... load it down, and suppress?

you could be in the 1050fps neck of the woods with a load that would easily kill a man, bear or godzilla, and by easily using the heaviest bullets available, such as a 400 or so.... I think it would be much more effective than a 338.
Theres virtually no expansion of a 338 projectile at that speed, and because of that, there is a very small temporary wound channel.
at least the heavy 45 in my simple mind would enter the body making a 20% larger entrance wound.. Additionally, theres no need to invent more supression systems for odd calibers, theres a ton of stuff on the market for .451 projectiles.

im happy with feedback, this is just me ranting.... but i just havent seen the light... Maybe im totally wrong and i need to focus my company in this direction more, but i need to understand the calling a little more first.
tridentarmory
 
Posts: 181
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 1:09 pm

Re: .338-.450BM (8.58 SOCOM) Development

Postby wildcatter » Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:12 am

I couldn't agree more with Trident.

The Doc (pittedbore) brings up some interesting questions.

First, let me just say, this guy with the overly neat bench and palm trees, is dangerously close to stomping on my Copywrites and Trademarks (I have then on all 450b variants from 475-17 cal), but that is not the real problem. I fear this gentleman might monkey things up to where it reflects badly on us.

To address some of the Doc's questions. This gentleman might just be spinning a yarn. First of all Barnes dose not make a 300 gr bullet, only Sierra does and I designed it for them, many long years ago. If one uses that bullet, in the manor where he suggest, he is so doing, the ojive is well into the case mouth. And further that 2200fps area is not believable. I can get 1800fps with that bullet, "BUUTTT" not without some Extreme, Impracticable, Tricks (Heck, the .338 Spectre, which is based on the 458 socom, which has much more case capacity than the 450b and for the 300gr SMK they only show 1000FPS, hence my suspicion of this gentleman's work.).

And, as Trident (James) has said, just choose the correct bullet for the mission and do them with the 450b, over the course.

As I have said, the backyard enthusiast is a real threat to us, as opposed to many who write on here, who are also very capable. I have not talked to James yet, but I plan to and plan to give him a helping hand as well, for anything that properly extends this science, has just got to be good, and I think that outfits like Trident, are well capable of doing allot of good..

..t
Last edited by wildcatter on Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:09 am, edited 2 times in total.
Safety First..t
User avatar
wildcatter
 
Posts: 2914
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 8:30 pm
Location: In the Middle of Deer Central Station or better known as, in the Thumb of Beautiful Michigan

Re: .338-.450BM (8.58 SOCOM) Development

Postby kottke_35 » Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:00 am

Hoot wrote:
kottke_35 wrote:Anybody seen this yet? 338 Spectre based off of the 6.8 spc and/or the 10mm magnum case. They are listing a 300 gr SMK bullet at about 1000fps out of an 18inch barrel. It's quite a bit different then the cartridge talked about in this forum but still may have it's place in some peoples hearts.

http://www.teppojutsu.com/338.htm

Information also found in ARRIFLEMAN March 2012 edition.

B.


That cartridge looks like one of those dogs that was spayed too young... :?

Hoot


Well...not the analogy that I was thinking but hey, it works!

B.
Warriors don't shoot bull's-eyes.

” Blessed are those, who in the face of death, focus on the front sight.”
-Col.. Jeff Cooper
kottke_35
 
Posts: 533
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 12:49 am
Location: North metro Colorado

Re: .338-.450BM (8.58 SOCOM) Development

Postby Texas Sheepdawg » Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:57 am

Now..... I'm just a lemur and WC is King Julien..... So my observation may be a bit like closing a barn door after the cows escaped.... But when I look at that cartridge, to me, it is visually silly and way out of balance. It just seems like you would have to have C4 or some other H.E. Just to get that projectile moving out of such a ridiculously tiny case. It just doesn't look like something practical. After seating the bullet, you don't have room for a powder charge of any sort to get that bullet to perform period. Visually..... It's a "Boy George" cartridge.
-Texas Sheepdawg

http://youtube.com/c/TexasSheepdawg21
NRA Life Member
User avatar
Texas Sheepdawg
 
Posts: 4732
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 10:55 am
Location: North Texas

Re: .338-.450BM (8.58 SOCOM) Development

Postby tridentarmory » Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:54 am

WC.

thanks for being so outspoken, im about to start another thread entitled 450 subsonic suppressed.
tridentarmory
 
Posts: 181
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 1:09 pm

Re: .338-.450BM (8.58 SOCOM) Development

Postby pitted bore » Wed Feb 01, 2012 4:56 pm

This post is a note regarding the 8.58 SOCOOM: You all may know the following. I didn't, but I don't try to keep up with the latest in AR equipment.

In info from the GTO forum linked in the original post on this thread, "HKI" was cited as the contractor behind starting work on the 8.58 SOCOM. Ditto on the boating forum. Here's some info on HKI that google came up with,

HKI is most likely not Heckler & Koch. HKI is very probably Houlding and Kaufman Ironworks (HKI), from Madera CA, The persons behind this outfit were Todd Houlding and Tom Kaufman.

Their website, hkironworks.com, is now off the net.

At least until recently, HKI were building and selling ARs:
Youtube: Machining a billet aluminum AR-15 Lower
Youtube: Custom machined AR-15 by HKI

HKI apparently has very recently spun off or changed into Houlding Precision Firearms, Inc: Link to HPFI.

They do custom ARs, like HKI. There was a grand opening of their store yesterday, Tuesday, 31 Jan 2012. I know nothing of them, but the NRA apparently thinks enough of them to permit them to put the NRA seal on the mag wells.

FWIW.

--Bob
edited to update link ot HPFI
Last edited by pitted bore on Sun Dec 02, 2012 10:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
pitted bore
 
Posts: 700
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 8:05 pm
Location: The U.P.'s U.P.

Re: .338-.450BM (8.58 SOCOM) Development

Postby wildcatter » Wed Feb 01, 2012 5:30 pm

tridentarmory wrote:WC.

thanks for being so outspoken, im about to start another thread entitled 450 subsonic suppressed.


My pleasure Sir, anything I can do to make your projects successful, I will..

..t
Safety First..t
User avatar
wildcatter
 
Posts: 2914
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 8:30 pm
Location: In the Middle of Deer Central Station or better known as, in the Thumb of Beautiful Michigan

Re: .338-.450BM (8.58 SOCOM) Development

Postby BillytheKid » Wed Feb 01, 2012 5:42 pm

After visiting that web page, here's what I came away with:

"excellent performance on small to medium size game"

I wouldn't want to use a 338 on small game...
"Now I am Breitbart, and there are millions more of us." - Me
User avatar
BillytheKid
 
Posts: 718
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 7:51 pm
Location: California

PreviousNext

Return to AR15 Style Rifles

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 99 guests