450B case trim length: Contradiction & Confusion

Talk about your 450b reloading experience, ask questions, etc...

Moderator: MudBug

Forum rules
Please try and keep it safe!

This information is the responsibility of the community, not the forum. 450bushmaster.net is not responsible if you blow yourselves up.

Re: 450B case trim length: Contradiction & Confusion

Postby Hoot » Wed Sep 05, 2012 7:26 pm

BD1 wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest the the trim to length of the .450 Bushmaster should be 1.70, the same dimension as the case length spec, and in fact you should never need to trim a Hornady factory .450B case.

I make this bold statement based on two factors: First, all straight wall cases get shorter every time they are re-sized, in my experience this is true across the board with no exceptions. There is no need to trim them once they are within spec. Second, I have never heard of a reported Hornady factory .450 B case longer than 1.70. if anyone has experienced such a case, please report it here. My problem with Hornady factory cases is that they become too short, (under minimum length for correct headspace), long before they wear out or split.

I have never trimmed a Hornady factory case, and have no intentions to ever do so.
BD


+1 again. I have never trimmed a Hornady case for this exact reason, aside from the 20 that I annealed and then only for the purpose of having them all start out the same length for behavior comparison. I have had them come new in the same box ranging from 1.70 down to 1.689 with the lower value being the exception. Never over 1.70, but they sure don't worry if they're shorter than 1.695. After the first firing, they then ranged from 1.679 to 1.692. After the second, they ranged from 1.669 to 1.689, but more were in the 1.675 to 1.685 range. After the third firing, they were all 1.685 or less.

Here's the kicker. The hotter you load them, the less they shrink. I personally believe it's because they chose to chrome plate the chamber to make maintenance easier. Mine has around 1600-1650 rounds through it and the chamber still looks like glass. That's got to be harder for the brass to hold onto when they're loaded lighter than one that just has a lustrous finish I would expect from simple CrMo or SS. That's speculative though. When Hornady chose to go away from the thicker .284 Winchester type brass that Wildcatter's design was based upon to the thinner stuff that they sell, they knew exactly what would happen and what they were doing was assuring a continuous revenue stream. Don't kid yourself. :roll:

When mine get below 1.675-1.680, I stop using them to develop and prove out loads. They're still very shootable though. In the interest of avoiding histrionics, the variation from 1.695 to 1.685 is the thickness of one playing card. That's not going to break this gun, nor with the thickness of 2 or 3. After they feed into the chamber being pushed ahead of the extractor, then bounce off that lip and the extraction hook picks them up, it pulls them back, snug against the bolt face anyway.

This same arousal and debate ignites over the .45 ACP, which behaves similarly, time and again.

Hoot


Hoot
In Theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In Practice, there is.
User avatar
Hoot
 
Posts: 3632
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:34 am
Location: Minnesota

Re: 450B case trim length: Contradiction & Confusion

Postby pitted bore » Wed Sep 05, 2012 8:42 pm

BD & Hoot-
I'm in agreement with your points. Hornady's published lengths, both max and trim, may be fictional.

My dissertation was intended to point out a problem with Hornady's contradictory specifications for the cartridge. I spent enough time trying to discover the basis of the contradiction that I wrote it up in case somebody else should walk into the problem as did stevewix.

The web note about trimming for FTX bullets had to be declared to be the nonsense it is.

As a side note, I really need to do a careful study of whether the cases stretch when used in the bolt guns. Certainly the chambers are not chromed.

Take care,
--Bob
User avatar
pitted bore
 
Posts: 670
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 8:05 pm
Location: The U.P.'s U.P.

Re: 450B case trim length: Contradiction & Confusion

Postby stevewix » Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:44 am

BD1 wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest the the trim to length of the .450 Bushmaster should be 1.70, the same dimension as the case length spec, and in fact you should never need to trim a Hornady factory .450B case.

I make this bold statement based on two factors: First, all straight wall cases get shorter every time they are re-sized, in my experience this is true across the board with no exceptions. There is no need to trim them once they are within spec. Second, I have never heard of a reported Hornady factory .450 B case longer than 1.70. if anyone has experienced such a case, please report it here. My problem with Hornady factory cases is that they become too short, (under minimum length for correct headspace), long before they wear out or split.

I have never trimmed a Hornady factory case, and have no intentions to ever do so.
BD

The only reason to trim straight-walled cases is to uniform them, and thereby uniform their neck tension as they go through the crimp whether it's a roll crimp or a taper crimp. Once these cases get too short they should probably be culled. I agree with you BD1!

Steve
stevewix
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 11:13 am

Re: 450B case trim length: Contradiction & Confusion

Postby Gruger » Thu Sep 06, 2012 11:31 am

We should get wildcatter to develop a .40 LM cartridge (or 9mm LM?), so we can reform out of spec .450 BM cartridges to .40 LM and put the brass to a new use :P
Something like the .357 sig (parent case .40 S&W) comes to mind.

The gods of reloading will smile on us..
Gruger, german Thumper.
User avatar
Gruger
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 1:41 pm

Re: 450B case trim length: Contradiction & Confusion

Postby longnkrnch » Thu Sep 06, 2012 12:14 pm

Some of mine have actually shrunk after firing. Before 1.695, after 1.690. Hoping they'll lengthen some when I size again
longnkrnch
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 3:06 pm
Location: NW Louisiana

Re: 450B case trim length: Contradiction & Confusion

Postby Hoot » Thu Sep 06, 2012 12:18 pm

stevewix wrote:...snip...The only reason to trim straight-walled cases is to uniform them, and thereby uniform their neck tension as they go through the crimp whether it's a roll crimp or a taper crimp. Once these cases get too short they should probably be culled. I agree with you BD1!

Steve


Steve et al,

WRT the taper crimp die and the need to precisely trim for precise tension, a length variation of .010 or less (think playing card thickness) will not have as much impact upon the degree of retention from the taper crimp as the normal variation in hardness from one manufacturing lot of brass to the next or even how many times they've been resized. If you segregate your brass by lot and by the number of times it has been resized, you'll do more for the taper crimp tension consistency than trimming alone. That having been said, if you trim as well, you do normalize the length of the case all the way around and that is always a plus.

My experience has been that the fired and resized case length varies a little. I never explored why, but I have observed that when I begin trimming, the trimmer will generally remove brass first from the longest part of the case and gradually remove more and more brass around the total mouth circumference until it is removing brass from the entire circumference. To me, that implies that aside from the chance that your trimmer or pilot are out of round, that the cases do not shrink lengthwise, evenly all the way around when fired. Whether that is the result of an assymmetrical chamber, assymmetrical brass manufacturing, or whatever, it is nonetheless a phenomenon I see all the time. When measuring a fired case, you can also get different readings when you rotate it as an indicator of uneven shrinkage. I don't recall that amount ever being more than 2 to 3 mils though.

I enjoy the art of reloading and any steps I can take to reduce variation from one case to the next, is time well spent. I do however realize that value is in the eye of the beholder. ;)

Hoot
In Theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In Practice, there is.
User avatar
Hoot
 
Posts: 3632
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:34 am
Location: Minnesota

Re: 450B case trim length: Contradiction & Confusion

Postby Draino » Fri Oct 13, 2017 7:13 pm

Well, isn't this just dandy?

Im using a mixture of factory loaded Hornady ammunition and Hornady brass, and I can confirm that my brass grows after resizing in most cases, betwee, .001 and .003 in length.

Im shooting out of a Ruger Scout. Perhaps its chamber is rough enough to hold onto the brass? I'll have to have a look. Im only just getting brass long enough to meet the 1.695 length after two firings.
Draino
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2017 5:52 pm

Re: 450B case trim length: Contradiction & Confusion

Postby plant_one » Fri Oct 13, 2017 7:33 pm

Draino wrote:Well, isn't this just dandy?

Im using a mixture of factory loaded Hornady ammunition and Hornady brass, and I can confirm that my brass grows after resizing in most cases, betwee, .001 and .003 in length.

Im shooting out of a Ruger Scout. Perhaps its chamber is rough enough to hold onto the brass? I'll have to have a look. Im only just getting brass long enough to meet the 1.695 length after two firings.


can you give us some more load data?

are you crimping? if so to what dia? what bullet? powder charge, etc
User avatar
plant_one
 
Posts: 474
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2016 8:58 pm
Location: Oakland County, MI

Previous

Return to Reloading for the 450b

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests