Texas Sheepdawg wrote:I believe this rifle to be much more capable then what you're looking at there at those targets. I believe this gun can shoot much better groups with the proper rest. But my table has tiny legs and the ground is soft and the table was sinking in the mud every time I shot.
Here ya go Dawg. Both averaged together are 3.9515MOA.
Now you have something to work against/with..
..t
Ps.. For you guys, that have the following down pat, stay out of my next question, I'm going to do a little teaching here. For you New Guys, New to the Ballistics Game, concerning these groups? I want to know what their overall size would be, if I extended these to 200yds, or better said, these groups, that the Dawg shot, went threw his target at 50 yards and then hit another target at 200yd.. "What would be their size, now"??? Tell us how you came to your conclusion. If you want to guess, then guess, sometimes that is the answer to hitting the target, it's called "Kentucky Windage", just say, "my guess is" or, "it's about.."..
I have gotten a couple of PM questions that start out.."I didn't want to look stupid, so instead of posting on the Board, I'd ask you directly". I always type back that No-One here would ever chastise you about being stupid, that we all have different levels of experience and WE-ALL have something to offer.
Now, what I'm trying to do here, is not only get data about 9mm Records, but it occurs to me that we could also use this data, as a teaching device. When you understand, what I'm actually asking, it'll make you Much Better, at hitting your un-known range targets and many-many other things as well, like which bullet/load combo works better for me and my needs, just to mention another one. Without answering my above question..Would you, more seasoned gents, please come up with some other ideas, as to why, knowing the answers to my question, makes you a better rifleman??
In the mean time I want to hear from guys, that didn't know the answer, until they got started down this road..t